One Man’s Justice

One Man’s Justice, by Akira Yoshimura

Japanese literature isn’t nearly as well known as it should be. Fashionable authors such as Banana Yoshimoto and Haruki Murakami cross over (both deservedly, to be fair) but authors such as Shusako Endo or Junichiro Tanizaki get nothing like the same fame, despite their brilliance. Japan has a literary tradition which, as best I can tell, is the rival of England or France, but with nothing of the recognition in the West.

To an extent that’s natural, and a tendency to see the Japanese as stranger than they of course are makes it worse, but it’s a loss because Japanese literature contains stories which are funny, bleak, profound, whimsical and which in many cases show an appreciation for style and craft which shines through the page. South of the Border, West of the Sun. Foreign Studies. Diary of a Mad Old Man. These are rewarding works, as well as classics such as I am a Cat (which I own, but haven’t got to yet I have to admit).

Akira Yoshimura, born in 1927 and who died in 2006, was president of Japan’s writers’ union. He wrote the novel which later became the masterful film Unagi (The Eel), a surprisingly tender story about the slow rehabilitation of a man who brutally murders his wife. So far however, only two of his novels have been translated into English (sadly not including the source for The Eel), Shipwrecked and One Man’s Justice. I’ve just finished One Man’s Justice, I’ll be buying Shipwrecked.

One Man’s Justice, written in 1978 and here published by Canongate and ably translated by Mark Ealey, is the story of Lieutenant Takuya of the Western Region Anti-Aircraft Defence Group. A highly efficient officer, Takuya is part of the wartime air defence control network for Western Japan, a man with an intimate knowledge of US aircraft, their flight paths, fuel capacities, payloads and who through his instructions to anti-aircraft crews and defensive fighters plays a key role in defending his region. Night after night, US bombers fly from bases in China to bombard Japanese cities, the numbers growing as the war goes against the Japanese, fire bombs raining down and killing civilians in huge numbers. The US of course is trying to break Japan’s morale, but Takuya knows nothing of this, to him the bomber crews are monsters, men slaughtering the innocent even in cities wholly devoid of military targets.

In the early part of the bombardment, however, many of the American crews don’t make it home. Before the anti-aircraft batteries and landing strips are destroyed, Takuya and men like him organise the defences effectively, bringing down a great many American planes. Most of the crew die with their planes, but not all, and though some are ripped apart by angry Japanese mobs where they land some survive to be taken prisoner.

As anger mounts, the air raids continue and increase in severity, food runs scarce, many of the cities of the Western region lie in ruins, officers return home from their reinforced bunkers to find their homes destroyed and relatives killed. Throughout, the American prisoners are fed, cared for, but increasingly resented. When Takuya learns through a translator that on the way home from a raid the Americans would listen to jazz, swap pornography, joke, his loathing of them becomes even more furious.

It occurred to Takuya that these twenty-four American airmen in front of him were the embodiment of an enemy which had slaughtered untold numbers of his people. They had come back again and again to devastate Japanese towns and cities, leaving behind countless dead and woudned civilians. The idea that these men were receiving rice balls despite the virtual exhaustion of food supplies for the average Japanese citizen stirred anger in Takuya towards those in headquarters responsible for such decisions.

When Takuya hears the prisoners have been tried for war crimes, sentenced to death, he welcomes the news – sad only that sentence is delayed in his own region. For him, injustice lies in feeding them, not killing them.

So then, war crimes. To Takuya, the American flight crews are war criminals, evil men who kill civilians in their thousands then relax to jazz as they fly home untouched. He sees their executions as a moral imperative, not a crime against a prisoner of war, but an act of justice. He is a product of the Japanese military machine, a loyal soldier, proud to serve and proud to fight for Japan and the Emperor.

The Americans invade Okinawa, but the strength of the resistance gives the mainland Japanese cause for hope, the Americans are bogged down, fighting is horrifically fierce, every inch of ground contested. When the Okinawan defenders arefinally defeated, there is no surrender, rather they fight to the last man killing as many Americans as they can before their inevitable defeat. The US is overstretched, if the same can be repeated on Japanese mainland soil, there is hope that the war could yet be won.

Meanwhile, some of the captured airmen in Takuya’s district are executed. Some are sent for medical experimentation, others are used for testing the efficiency of new weapons, none of this strikes Takuya as remotely problematic. Rather, he is pleased that these criminals are being put to some good use, the question of whether their treatment is justifiable, whether the crimes he regards them as having committed merit such punishments, does not occur to him.

As the war draws to its close, the order comes to execute the remaining prisoners, to destroy all papers relating to them, if Japan loses the story will be that no executions took place, the prisoners were destroyed in an air raid while being moved between facilities, for that to be credible there must of course be no survivors. Takuya takes part in the executions, himself decapitating a prisoner, proud again to be of service and regretting only that he was allowed to kill but one of them.

This is challenging stuff, the point of view of a man who is a war criminal, who executes a prisoner and who when he does so does it not because of that prisoner’s own crimes (real or perceived) but because higher command wishes to cover up the treatment of other prisoners. This doesn’t occur to Takuya, he sees himself as delivering justice, but it is quite clear that his justice is the instrument of the fear of others, fear of retribution should the Americans win.

The Japanese prepare for invasion, for a scorched Earth partisan war, for a no-surrender battle over the entire soil of Japan. That is, until Hiroshima. Until Nagasaki. Until the Emperor’s surrender, an announcement so shocking that grown men weep, that Takuya has to explain to some of his men that the war is over, the idea of surrender so alien some have not understood the broadcast. And with the war over, with the occupation, it is no longer the Japanese who are deciding what constitutes a war crime.

The bulk of One Man’s Justice is not the above, this is not military fiction in any meaningful sense, rather it is the story of Takuya’s flight in a devastated and defeated country, despite the efforts of high command the Americans do learn that their airmen were executed, orders are given for the arrest of those involved. Takuya goes from being a loyal soldier, an example of Japanese honour and martial spirit, to a hunted fugitive and increasingly to a reminder of a Japan nobody now wishes to admit having been part of.

This then, is a psychological study, a study of defeat, despair, fear and the choices made by a man who knows that if caught he will surely be hanged. Takuya approaches family, friends, but they cannot help him or will not, and in any event the police are relentless in pursuing war criminals and all those he knew before will be subject to surveillance and interrogation.

The power of this novel lies in its detail, it is not an especially long book, under 300 pages, but it is painstaking in showing Takuya’s life on the run and its terrible cost. The nights spent sleeping rough, the pleas for aid, the oiling of a pistol for use to kill himself should he be about to be taken. Constantly moving, imposing himself on distant acquaintances and living in spare rooms for a week or so, while his hosts grow more resentful and the risk of his being reported increases. One of the reviews on the back cover refers to this book as “a haunting and beautifully rendered tale of enduring optimism”. No. This is a tale of the cost of living in fear, Yoshimura is not a man who believes that no matter what, you cannot be stripped of your dignity. You most certainly can.

More often than not, Takuya spent his evenings sitting in the little room at the back, squashing the fleas crawling over his clothes. Most of those he dispatched were a pinkish colour, gorged with blood which spilt out on to his fingernails as he crushed them. Occasionally he would hold a piece of underwear up to the electric light and find lines of delicately formed eggs, like tiny rosary beads, sitting neatly inside the stitching. He pierced each of them individually with a needle before going on to check the next piece of clothing. Other times, after he had got under the covers on his futon, he would take the pistol out of his rucksack and caress it in the semi-darkness. He wiped the barrel with a cloth and tested the tension of the trigger with his index finger. When he held it up to his nose, he could just detect the faint smell of oil.

Yoshimura of course lived through the post war years, and his descriptions are highly convincing. Millions die of starvation and disease, lice and vermin are everywhere. There are few jobs to be found, even the most basic materials are hard to come by, prostitution and black marketeering are rife. Among all this, the American troops travel Japan with the confidence of conquerors, effortlessly aware of their own victory.

Takuya could hear the crowd of urchins still calling out to the soldiers, ‘ Haroo, Haroo!’ He could not understand what on earth these children, and the adults standing behind them, could be doing milling around American military trucks.
As he sat contemplating the scene, he saw something quite astounding. The children had stopped calling out, and were now bent over, frantically scramblign to grab something off the ground. The adults who had been bystanders seconds earlier were also racing helter-skelter among the children, picking things up off the road. The soldiers in the truck were throwing small objects out from under the furled canvas hoods. A black soldier in one lorry purposely threw them as far as he could, and one of his white comrades in the other one watched in fits of laughter as adults and children responded to his feigned throws. Takuya sat there aghast, transfixed by what he saw.

The newspapers each day carry news of trials for war crimes, men are executed for having slapped prisoners, levels of violence normal within the Japanese army and so to Takuya wholly blameless. To him, the trials are mere revenge, but then it becomes apparent that those of his colleagues who like him went on the run are slowly being captured, their photos up in every police station, his superiors denying all knowledge of the incident and claiming Takuya and his comrades acted without orders. He cannot risk being seen in public, any encounter with the police could lead to his recognition, and so his execution, he dreams of taking dangerous work in the mines, where nobody will see him.

This is a claustrophobic novel, suffused with dread, Takuya comes to fear every stranger he passes in case they recognise him. Avoids anywhere he might meet anyone he knew, lives in a state of constant paranoia, that may or may not be justified. I will not say here where this leads, but it is fair to say the title is of course a definite play on words. Takuya, one man, exercises his justice in killing an American airman, but he too receives his justice living as an exile in his own land as the Americans and the new government pursue all those involved in such offences. Takuya is both perpetrator and victim, an instrument of justice from one perspective and a target for it from another. Yoshimura makes nothing easy here, the text exhaustively sets out the scale of the US bombardment, the toll of civilian lives, the viewpoint of the Japanese soldiers and their grounds for feeling themselves justified in their actions to the prisoners. And yet, there is no sense that medical experiments, weapons testing, pointless executions in forest clearings, that any of it is justified in return. Justice here is a social construct, an idea held by men, influenced by politics and expediency. This is not the territory of facile equivalency, rather it is a lack of any comforting answers at all.

As the occupation continues, as time passes, Takuya is changed by his constant hiding. Troubled by memories of the man he killed, cowed by the sheer physical presence of the American troops, worn down by constant flight and concealment. The war is passing into memory, quicker than he could have dreamed, his sense of righteousness – of justification, fades and although at first the sight of a Japanese girl with an American enrages him such anger cannot be maintained in the new reality he now inhabits. Takuya is in microcosm Japan, humiliated, defeated, powerless. His certainty, his superiority has been destroyed along with the cities he once defended, within a few short years nobody talks any more of the civilians dead in the bombings, of whether the US’s conduct of the war was justified. The only man who raises at his trial a defence of justification, that he executed prisoners who had been lawfully tried and who were punished themselves for the targeted bombing of civilians, is of course hanged. Under the Japanese and the Americans both, only the defeated are ever on trial.

Although dryly written (at times perhaps a little too much so), this is a powerful novel that deals in themes of patriotism, the cost of war, justice, defeat and how history is both remembered and forgotten. It addresses extremely difficult themes and a disturbing period of Japanese history, and it is unsettling and ambiguous offering no reassuringly hateful villains. The novel opens with Takuya on a train crammed with people, so tightly packed a young boy is at risk of suffocating, Takuya ensuring he has space in which to breathe. These are the first words of the novel, it’s entire story in microcosm:

The boy’s eyes were no longer on Takuya.
Each time the train lurched, the boy’s head, covered in ringworm, was buried in the gap between Takuya and the middle-aged woman standing in front of him. Takuya would lean back to create enough space for the boy to breathe. The boy looked up at Takuya repeatedly. There was a shadow of resignation in his eyes, a recognition of his powerlessness in the mass of adults, as well as a flicker of light, an entrusting of his well-being to this man who kept shifting back for him. Before long, however, the boy’s head dropped. The strain of leaning to one side may have been too much for him, for now he hardly moved his head when he was pressed between the adults. The woman standing in front of them seemed to be the boy’s mother, and Takuya could sense that he was holding on to the cloth of her work trousers.

Before we learn of Takuya’s crimes, before we learn of his isolation and despair, we see his humanity. We see that he is a patriot, a soldier, a man who believes he is doing his best for his country. That morality, that generosity, makes this book all the more challenging. If Takuya were simply evil, his crime would be so much easier to understand, he would be easier to condemn. Instead, we are put as readers in the difficult place of understanding a man who does a terrible thing, of empathising with him, raising question of what justice is and whether victor’s justice (from whatever source) can ever be anything of the kind.

One Man’s Justice. For those wanting another perspective, there’s a good review of the book at the Guardian, here.

Advertisements

17 Comments

Filed under Japanese Literature, Yoshimura, Akira

17 responses to “One Man’s Justice

  1. Excellent review, as usual Max. My observation would be that the “other” side in the Pacific Theatre has received a lot less attention than has that in the European theatre — and I do acknowledge the any portrayal of the other side is always controversial.

    I would put that down to three main factors (and I am sure there are others): 1. No internal Pacific resistance movement, therefore no internal conflict stories (sidebar is that this is the result of Imperial control). 2. Translation issues. 3. Relatively small numbers of Displaced Persons (DPs) in the “winning” countries, so less of an incentive to tell their story.

    It does strike me that this book comes closer to giving us some idea of what is motivating the “other” side in Iraq and Afghanistan than much other historical fiction. I don’t think the comparison is direct by any means, but some of the themes of “honour” (I’m using that term as an umbrella) seem to be playing out now in a way that we Western Hemisphere types don’t really understand.

    I’ve almost talked myself into buying this book. Thanks for adding some challenging thought to the morning.

  2. I can’t help but observe that your post has generated an automatically generated link to a review of The Naked and The Dead. I think that as much as anything else illustrates the point I was trying to make in my comment.

  3. The parallels with contemporary conflicts did strike me, the psychological impact and resentment of occupation.

    I must read The Naked and the Dead, and yes, it does rather illustrate your point.

  4. Pingback: World History » One Man's Justice « Pechorin's Journal

  5. You have talked me into Yoshimura. You know, from some of my own reviews, that I am a sucker for a well-written scene. You have pulled several devastating snapshots. While the winners usually write history, the losers have great stories too. Thanks for bringing this one to my attention.

    I am trying to work in more translations to my reading queue and this one seems to fit the bill. Thanks.

  6. I recently read Empire of the Sun, in which Ballard refuses to condemn the Japanese, often speaking of his (his semi-autobiograpical character’s) admiration. At the time I thought that was challenging.

    One Man’s Justice would be interesting to read for purposes of compare and contrast, and perhaps to discover the true meaning of challenging…

    I have only ever read one Japanese novel to date, (Murakami, naturally.) Straying from the beaten path is something I find personally rewarding, (even if the reasoning is a little shallow.)

    In short, great review. It’s the moral ambiguity, which you convey powerfully, that appeals. The search for easy answers is compelling if hopeless.

  7. Well, for really challenging one needs to reach for stuff like William Burroughs, where merely reading it is a challenge as he plays games with cut-up narrative and randomisation of textual input. Not sure I have the energy these days though.

    Murakami can be marvellous, he’s fashionable, but for a reason. I think he’s actually an extremely talented author, I’ve read several and none so far have disappointed. If you liked the one you read, it’s worth trying others.

  8. Pingback: Nobody would feed those judged certain to die. « Pechorin’s Journal

  9. leroyhunter

    I was pointed here by your new Yoshimura review Max. This sounds well worth a look. It’s funny, the descriptions of Takuya on the run read like and exactly mirror the situation of the protagonist of James Dickey’s To The White Sea, except he is an American airman shot down on one of the missions Takuya suffers under. Further complicating things is the fact Dickey’s narrator is an Indian, and feels at best ambiguous about many of “his” country’s qualities and people. It’s also a very drily written work, a style I could imagine would put many off with the detail of tiny survival transactions and predicaments. There’s a questioning of the role of the attacker and his presence in the (to him) threatening world of the enemy is seen to almost be unnatural, an insult.

    This is on the wish list.

  10. leroyhunter

    “patriotism, the cost of war, justice, defeat and how history is both remembered and forgotten”

    Don’t know if you’ve ever come across it, but for another perspective on these themes I’d recommend Strange Defeat by Marc Bloch. He was a highly respected historian who became a Resistance fighter in the 1940s before being captured and executed by the Gestapo (he was also Jewish). He reflects on the calamitous defeat of France in 1940 and the role of the French people and government in their own downfall.

  11. It’s always a pleasure to get a new comment on an old post.

    Some nice recommendations there Lee, I don’t know either. I’ll take a note.

    Strange Defeat sounds like challenging stuff in its own right.

  12. leroyhunter

    It’s a fascinating book, by an intellectual and patriot who considers it his duty to attack and expose his countrymen’s failings and show how they lead to subjugation by Germany.

    Incidentally I believe at one time the Coen brothers were considering filming the Dickey book I mentioned, but made No Country For Old Men instead.

  13. Pingback: One Man’s Justice – Akira Yoshimura « A Rat in the Book Pile

  14. I’d like to add a word of caution here. Japanese literature is highly regarded in France and the German speaking countries. Translations abound. It’s really typical of the anglophone country to be more reluctant. Many books that I see reviewed now have been available for years in French or German.
    This sounds like an excellent book and would have been a great choice for my readalong but it will be Black Rain by Ibuse. This one has parallels with the Endo we read this year. Where does a war crime start, what makes you ultimately a war criminal? Interesting questions that make for great discussions. And it seems to be able to show that even gentle people can do horrible things when they have had to endure too much.
    I think Japanese WWII novels are very dense and I’m a bit anxious to read Black Rain or rather to make people read it as I’m aware that there are many bloggers who say to be interested in war but they are interested in some sugary slick glossed over WWII romance which I usually can’t stand.

  15. Sounds like a morally complex novel, Max.

    I expect you to love Balchin’s novel BTW.

  16. Not sure how I missed Leroy and Caroline’s comments there.

    Anyway, it definitely is, I think you might like it.

    I’ve finished the Balchin. Marvellous, absolutely excellent.

  17. I’ve read a few and they’re all top notch–although I understand that some of the others, ones I haven’t read yet, aren’t as good, so perhaps I hit the best ones first.

    There’s a film of this well worth catching and it has quite a few differences from the book. It’s a Powell and Pressburger film

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s