God, it’s funny, being a woman!

Good Morning, Midnight, by Jean Rhys

Actually, going on Jean Rhys’s 1939 novel Good Morning, Midnight, it’s not funny at all.

Jean Rhys is a new writer to me, who I discovered through John Self’s blog The Asylum. John recommended this work as a good place to start with her work, for which he has my thanks.

Good Morning, Midnight was Rhys’s fourth novel and fifth published work (her first work was a short story collection), and in common with much of her early work is an examination of a woman struggling with depression and living a marginalised and alienated existence. I read the Penguin Modern Classics edition, which comes with an excellent introduction by AL Kennedy which for me helped illuminate the book without overcrowding it. Indeed, so good was the introduction, I now find myself more interested in reading Kennedy’s own work.

Good Morning, Midnight has only one fully realised character, it’s narrator Sophia Jansen. Jansen is a woman conscious that she is no longer young, but not yet old, who has come to Paris after a gap of some years. She is depressed, cries in public, drinks more than is socially acceptable. She is intensely fragile, hugely conscious of the judgements of strangers and both lonely and afraid of company. All other characters in the novel are seen through her eyes, and since she is mired in her own suffering and often ill-disposed to company, we see them only through a glass, darkly.

The opening paragraph of the novel sets the tone:

‘Quite like old times,’ the room says. ‘Yes? No?’
There are two beds, a big one for madame and a smaller one on the opposite side for monsieur. The wash-basic is shut off by a curtain. It is a large room, the smell of cheap hotels faint, almost imperceptible. The street outside is narrow, cobble-stoned, going sharply uphill and ending in a flight of steps. What they call an impasse.
I have been here five days. I have decided on a place to eat in at midday, a place to eat in at night, a place to have my drink in after dinner. I have arranged my little life.

We are in the Europe of seedy rooms, of the squalor not of poverty but of never quite enough (though the squalor of poverty makes an appearance too). We are in the country of those who have not quite succeeded, and who have been cast aside as superfluous to society’s needs.

The novel is largely plotless, it is written in what is essentially a stream of consciousness, and as Jansen’s attention shifts so does that of the novel so that we find ourselves dipping into incidents years past – following the chronology of emotion rather than time. Rhys is a skilled writer, and this lack of plot is never confusing and the apparent lack of structure just that, apparent only.

In large part, the novel is an exploration of the experience of depression. Thoughts often drift off into ellipses, Jansen is prone to sudden tears, to crippling self-doubt. Frequently she simply thinks, considering her life and existence in general. At times her reflections are comic, as when she imagines the unborn fighting among themselves to avoid being next in the queue for birth, more often though her thoughts are not humorous at all:

People talk about the happy life, but that’s the happy life when you don’t care any longer if you live or die. You only get there after a long time and many misfortunes. And do you think you are left there? Never.
As soon as you have reached this heaven of indifference, you are pulled out of it. From your heaven you have to go back to hell. When you are dead to the world, the world often rescues you, if only to make a figure of fun out of you.

As a depiction of depression, the work is masterly and wholly convincing. It is a short work, 159 pages in the Penguin edition, and that brevity allows an engagement with disaffection and apathy that in a longer work could risk alienating the reader. I would not call it an easy read, even so, but it is a rewarding one.

As well as an evocation of what it is to be depressed, the novel also addresses the experience of alienation. Here though, unlike the protagonists of authors such as Patrick Hamilton or Julian Maclaren-Ross, Jansen is a woman and the alienation is all the worse by reason of that. Jansen suffers not only from the stigma of insufficient money, poorly chosen relationships and drinking more than is socially accepted, but also from the shame of being a woman for whom these things are true. Society disdains the drunk, but it disdains far more the female drunk. Jansen’s position is worsened merely by reason of her gender.

Jansen moves through Paris almost as if she were a ghost, choosing bars which have few patrons, restaurants where noone will pay attention to her. She drinks, but is ashamed of doing so, seeing in the mirror her own bedraggled state and condemning herself as much as, if not more than, others do. She whiles away her days wandering the streets, avoiding meaningful contact, lost in her own private darkness.

I go into a tabac. The woman at the bar gives me one of those looks: What do you want here, you? We don’t cater for tourists here, not our clientele. … Well, dear madame, to tell you the truth, what I want here is a drink – I rather think two, perhaps three.
It is cold and dark outside, and everything has gone out of me except misery.

Jansen does meet some others during the course of the novel, two exiled Russians who treat her kindly, an artist who does likewise, these men she avoids for in her state of self-loathing she has little time for those who are kind to her. Others, a gigolo who latches on to her under the mistaken impression that she has money, she is more drawn to, destructively attracted to men who ultimately do not care and who do not treat her well. Men for her are like drink, a means to brief oblivion, both cause and reminder of her present condition.

At times, Jansen seeks to change her lot, she has her hair done, seeks a different room, buys a new dress. None of it assists, the problems are internal, she has no idea of how to be normal or happy and is in any event ambivalent about both those things and the mass of people who are examples of them. She seeks to escape her depression, but has no belief that she can, and since what she seeks to escape is inside her she has no real prospect of success in any event.

In large part then this is a novel of despair, of an intelligent woman for whom all options seem equally barren and futile, and who however she tries cannot quite make herself fit in to what is expected of her. There are signs that she has been happy in the past, but never securely and never for long.

But, after all, those were still the days when I went into a cafe to drink coffee, when I could feel gay on half a bottle of wine, when this happened and that happened.
But they never last, the golden days. And it can be sad, the sun in the afternoon, can’t it? Yes, it can be sad, the afternoon sun, sad and frightening.

Good Morning, Midnight is a skilfully written work about a painful subject matter, about hopelessness, self-destruction and crushing apathy. It is evocative, it is remarkable in its depiction of the inner life of a woman lost in depression and the hell of poor choices, it is subtle and clever and pitched at the right length not to outstay its welcome. Having read it, I likely will read more Rhys, though given the nature of her work perhaps not too soon after this one.

As with much literary fiction, Rhys stands or falls by her prose, it seems only fair then to leave her the last words as she once again captures the experience of depression more accurately than any other writer I can personally think of:

You are walking along a road peacefully. You trip. You fall into blackness. That’s the past – or perhaps the future. And you know that there is no past, no future, there is only this blackness, changing faintly, slowly, but always the same.

Good Morning, Midnight

About these ads

14 Comments

Filed under Modernist Fiction, Paris, Personal canon, Rhys, Jean

14 responses to “God, it’s funny, being a woman!

  1. I’m very interested, Max. The only thing I’ve read by Rhys is Wide Sargasso Sea, and I didn’t really like how it was written. I thought the idea was brilliant, but at times it felt like I was reading a poor translation.

    I think I need to rethink all of that, though, and becoming acquainted with her other works seems to be a good way to do that.

  2. Wide Sargasso Sea never tempted me, still doesn’t to be honest. In terms of the writing, Rhys is quite idiosyncratic (going on this novel anyway), I’ve tried to use what seemed fairly representative quotes in my blog entry and if they remind you of Wide Sargasso it may be just that this isn’t a writer you take to.

    Still, this particular work has at least the benefit of being brief and was John’s suggestion (on your blog I think, but I can’t recall where exactly) for a good place to start, so if you want to explore her further this is probably the book to pick up.

  3. adevotedreader

    I woudln’t give up on Wide Sargasso Sea Max- like all of Rhys’s work it is “remarkable in its depiction of the inner life of a woman lost in depression and the hell of poor choices” with the added interest of being another perspective on Jane Eyre.

  4. Thanks for that, I shan’t then, though I shall have to read Jane Eyre first I think…

    My knowledge of the Brontë’s is not what it should be. Would you recommend Jane Eyre in its own right?

  5. I loved Jane Eyre. Interestingly, my wife hated it enough that she didn’t finish the last few dozen pages.

    I thinks she’s wrong, though, and definitely recommend it before reading Wide Sargasso Sea should you venture that way. Having Jane Eyre as the background, a landmark feminist book to begin with, is very interesting when seeing just how much the presumably progressive book Jane Eyre still fails to grasp some fundamental points in its negligent treatment of Bertha (or Antoinette Cosway).

  6. I applaud her for abandoning a book on the last few pages, it’s hard to do but sometimes it is worthwhile if you’re really not enjoying something. Every extra page is a page you could have spent with a book you actually like after all.

    My impression had been that Jane Eyre was a work of gothic fiction, I’m getting the impression though that if it is it’s also much more than that. I shall have to take a look clearly.

  7. Irene Wilde

    Darling Max,

    You are about the fourth person in two weeks to mention this author and this book to me. I think it’s going to end up next on the TBR list at this rate.

    Grand review.

    Irene

  8. Thanks for this review, Max — Rhys is one of those authors that I read about but never have got around to reading. This may motivate me to get started.

    I’d second the idea of reading Jane Eyre. It is not a perfect book, but it does come close. Like a lot of Victorian work, the plot can get in the way of what is good about the book (which I suspect is what happened with Mrs. Berrett, but if you mentally guard against that, it is a most valuable read.

  9. I shall take Jane Eyre off my mental NTBR list on which it had found itself (not to be read).

    What I now want to look into more funnily enough is AL Kennedy, I’ve not read her work at all, but the introduction was lucid and well written to such an extent that I’d now like to see what she’s written in her own right.

  10. A terrific account of this book, Max, and I’m delighted to have been instrumental in introducing you to Rhys. Like Trevor, I didn’t warm to Wide Sargasso Sea, but made the mistake of reading it before Jane Eyre so I would be very happy to give it another go.

    One word of warning is that I believe most of Rhys’s non-Sargasso novels are very similar and should probably only be approached at long intervals. Having said that, she’s such a strong voice that I thoroughly enjoyed returning to her (with Voyage in the Dark) nonetheless.

    my wife hated [Jane Eyre] enough that she didn’t finish the last few dozen pages

    Reader, she married him.

  11. Oh and I’ve never been able to get on with AL Kennedy’s books. Good luck, and let us know!

  12. I definitely don’t plan to read Wide Sargasso pre-Jane Eyre, I suspect I’d miss much of what it was trying to achieve.

    I think I will read more Rhys, but I note the warning, so I’ll probably leave it a year or so before doing so.

  13. Pingback: Didn’t you say that sex was a ferocious thing? « Pechorin’s Journal

  14. Pingback: Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys « Book Around The Corner

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s